#문제 항목 재정렬하기!

우리는 질문의 항목을 재정렬하는 것이 가능합니다! 지금부터 이 기능을 다양하게 활용해보도록 하겠습니다 😎

Prompt ↓

John of Worcester, an English monk, recorded the sighting, on December 8, 1128, of two unusually large sunspots. Five days later a brilliant aurora borealis (northern lights) was observed in southern Korea. Sunspot activity is typically followed by the appearance of an aurora borealis, after a span of time that averages five days. Thus, the Korean sighting helps to confirm John of Worcester's sighting. Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument? a) John of Worcester's account included a drawing of the sunspots, which could be the earliest illustration of sunspot activity. b) Because it is impossible to view sunspots with the naked eye under typical daylight conditions, the sighting recorded by John of Worcester would have taken place under unusual weather conditions such as fog or thin clouds. c) An aurora borealis can sometimes occur even when there has been no significant sunspot activity in the previous week. d) Chinese sources recorded the sighting of sunspots more than 1000 years before John of Worcester did. e) Only heavy sunspot activity could have resulted in an aurora borealis viewable at a latitude as low as that of Korea. Let’s explain step by step

Output ↓

A) Weakens - This option weakens the argument because it implies that the aurora borealis did not necessarily need to be caused by sunspot activity, which is the argument the author is trying to make. B) Doesn't Impact - This option does not impact the argument because it is unrelated to the connection between the sunspots and the appearance of the aurora borealis. C) Strengthens - This option strengthens the argument because it suggests that the only way an aurora borealis could be seen in Korea is if there had been heavy sunspot activity, which is what John of Worcester observed. D) Weakens - This option weakens the argument because it implies that the conditions under which John of Worcester observed the sunspots may not have been reliable, which could cast doubt on the accuracy of his sighting. E) Doesn't Impact - This option does not impact the argument because it is unrelated to the connection between the sunspots and the appearance of the aurora borealis.

앞서 해왔던 예시들의 질문을 바꿔보도록 할까요?

• Recall the original prompt was this : 원래 프롬프트가 다음과 같았다는 것을 기억하세요 → Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument? 다음 중 사실일 경우 주장을 가장 강력하게 뒷받침하는 것은 무엇인가요?
• We can change the prompt to this : 프롬프트를 이렇게 변경할 수 있습니다 → Identify each choice as strengthens, weakens or doesn't impact the argument. 각 선택 사항을 주장을 강화하거나 약화하거나 영향을 미치지 않는 것으로 식별합니다.

를 클릭하여 답안 선택에 대한 추가 인사이트를 얻을 수 있습니다!

Prompt ↓

John of Worcester, an English monk, recorded the sighting, on December 8, 1128, of two unusually large sunspots. Five days later a brilliant aurora borealis (northern lights) was observed in southern Korea. Sunspot activity is typically followed by the appearance of an aurora borealis, after a span of time that averages five days. Thus, the Korean sighting helps to confirm John of Worcester's sighting. Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument? a) An aurora borealis can sometimes occur even when there has been no significant sunspot activity in the previous week. b) Chinese sources recorded the sighting of sunspots more than 1000 years before John of Worcester did. c) Only heavy sunspot activity could have resulted in an aurora borealis viewable at a latitude as low as that of Korea. d) Because it is impossible to view sunspots with the naked eye under typical daylight conditions, the sighting recorded by John of Worcester would have taken place under unusual weather conditions such as fog or thin clouds. e) John of Worcester's account included a drawing of the sunspots, which could be the earliest illustration of sunspot activity. Identify each choice as strengthens, weakens or doesn't impact the argument and explain step by step.

Output ↓